Skip to content
Screener

ISMF vs BDYN

iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF

ISMF

iShares Managed Futures Active ETF

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$59M

BDYN

iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$2.9B

Key differences

ISMF is an alternative ETF, while BDYN is a mixed asset ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and BDYN 0.40%.

  • ISMF is an alternative fund, while BDYN is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
  • BDYN costs 0.40% less per year.
  • BDYN is much larger than ISMF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ISMFBDYN
Annual cost (TER)0.80%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$59M$2.9B
Since20252017
Dividend yield2.49%0.91%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionglobal
Strategymanaged futuresactive selection
CAGR 1Y+21.6%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y8.02%
Max drawdown-4.23%-10.85%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ISMF and BDYN