Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ENHU vs ECNS

iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF

ENHU

iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF

Annual cost

0.22%

Fund size

$10M

ECNS

iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$71M

Key differences

Both ENHU and ECNS are equity ETFs. ENHU charges 0.22% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: ENHU follows a active selection strategy; ECNS uses index tracking.

  • ENHU follows a active selection strategy; ECNS uses index tracking.
  • ENHU covers North America; ECNS covers emerging markets.
  • ENHU costs 0.37% less per year.
  • ECNS is much larger than ENHU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ENHUECNS
Annual cost (TER)0.22%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$10M$71M
Since20252010
Dividend yield6.40%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+7.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.4%
CAGR 5YN/A-7.2%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.27
Volatility 1Y21.06%
Max drawdown-8.98%-63.44%

Similar to ENHU and ECNS