Screener
EPOL vs PCIG
iShares MSCI Poland ETF vs Polen Capital International Growth ETF
Key differences
- EPOL costs 0.26% less per year.
- EPOL is significantly larger than PCIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPOL covers europe markets; PCIG covers global.
- EPOL follows a index tracking strategy; PCIG uses active selection.
- EPOL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPOL | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $609M | $27M |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 0.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | -12.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.48% | 18.42% |
| Max drawdown | -61.40% | -23.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPOL and PCIG
Explore further