Screener
EPOL vs PCGG
iShares MSCI Poland ETF vs Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Key differences
- EPOL costs 0.26% less per year.
- EPOL is significantly larger than PCGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPOL follows a index tracking strategy; PCGG uses active selection.
- EPOL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPOL | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $609M | $9M |
| Since | 2010 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | -5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.48% | 15.33% |
| Max drawdown | -61.40% | -22.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPOL and PCGG
Explore further