Screener
EPOL vs PCLG
iShares MSCI Poland ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Key differences
- PCLG costs 0.10% less per year.
- EPOL is significantly larger than PCLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPOL covers europe markets; PCLG covers north america.
- EPOL follows a index tracking strategy; PCLG uses active selection.
- EPOL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPOL | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $609M | $98M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.48% | — |
| Max drawdown | -61.40% | -23.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPOL and PCLG
Explore further