Screener
EPP vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EPP costs 0.25% less per year.
- EPP covers global markets; AAXJ covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPP | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $3.8B |
| Since | 2001 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.43% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -39.30% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPP and AAXJ
Explore further