Screener
EPP vs SCJ
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- EPP is significantly larger than SCJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPP covers global markets; SCJ covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPP | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $235M |
| Since | 2001 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.43% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 16.10% |
| Max drawdown | -39.30% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPP and SCJ
Explore further