Screener
EPRF vs MANI
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- EPRF covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | — |
| Since | 2016 | — |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | structured outcome | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -0.73% |
Similar to EPRF and MANI
Explore further