Screener
EPRF vs IG
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.28% less per year.
- EPRF is classified as alternative, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; IG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $179M |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.6% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.51% | 4.75% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -23.17% |
Similar to EPRF and IG
Explore further