Screener
EPRF vs NMAY
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.32% less per year.
- EPRF is significantly larger than NMAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | NMAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $14M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 4.64% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -1.71% |
Similar to EPRF and NMAY
Explore further