Screener
EPRF vs NOCT
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.32% less per year.
- NOCT is significantly larger than EPRF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, NOCT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | NOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $237M |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 7.65% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -16.21% |
Similar to EPRF and NOCT
Explore further