Screener
EPRF vs TAPR
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.32% less per year.
- EPRF is significantly larger than TAPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | TAPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $11M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -2.60% |
Similar to EPRF and TAPR
Explore further