Screener
ESMV vs ACWV
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- ACWV is significantly larger than ESMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESMV covers north america markets; ACWV covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, ESMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESMV | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 2.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.0% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.11% | 7.75% |
| Max drawdown | -19.77% | -28.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESMV and ACWV
Explore further