Screener
ESPO vs BETZ
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.20% less per year.
- ESPO is significantly larger than BETZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $51M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 4.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | -7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 20.37% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -60.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and BETZ
Explore further