Screener
ESPO vs BOTZ
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.13% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | BOTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 24.21% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -55.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and BOTZ
Explore further