Screener
ESPO vs IBOT
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Vaneck Robotics ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.08% less per year.
- ESPO is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ESPO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | IBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $71M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +58.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 22.06% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -25.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and IBOT
Explore further