Screener
ESPO vs CGGO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESPO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -24.90% |
Similar to ESPO and CGGO
Explore further