Screener
ESPO vs CGGR
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESPO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -28.90% |
Similar to ESPO and CGGR
Explore further