Screener
ESPO vs CGGE
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Capital Group Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGE costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGGE is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESPO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | CGGE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 13.90% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -14.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and CGGE
Explore further