Screener
IBOT vs SMH
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.12% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.1% | +151.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +39.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.06% | 30.57% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and SMH
Explore further