Screener
ESPO vs SMOG
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $152M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and SMOG
Explore further