Screener
ESPO vs EINC
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs VanEck Energy Income ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EINC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $147M |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +22.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 14.53% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -68.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and EINC
Explore further