Screener
ETHA vs ECNS
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
ETHA is a cryptocurrency ETF, while ECNS is an equity ETF. ETHA charges 0.25% a year and ECNS 0.59%.
- ETHA is a cryptocurrency fund, while ECNS is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ETHA costs 0.34% less per year.
- ETHA is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ETHA | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.9B | $71M |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | — | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -40.3% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 69.44% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -67.56% | -63.44% |
Similar to ETHA and ECNS
Explore further