Screener
EUDV vs EFAD
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- EFAD costs 0.05% less per year.
- EFAD is significantly larger than EUDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EUDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EUDV | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $62M |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.69% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.1% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.1% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.09% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -37.51% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EUDV and EFAD
Explore further