Screener
EWA vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EWA and AAXJ are equity ETFs. EWA charges 0.50% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: EWA costs 0.22% less per year.
- EWA costs 0.22% less per year.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWA | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $4.0B |
| Since | 1996 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -45.54% | -44.52% |
Similar to EWA and AAXJ
Explore further