Screener
EWA vs SCJ
iShares MSCI Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both EWA and SCJ are equity ETFs. EWA charges 0.50% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: EWA is much larger than SCJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWA is much larger than SCJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWA | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $245M |
| Since | 1996 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -45.54% | -37.28% |
Similar to EWA and SCJ
Explore further