Screener
EWH vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EWH and AAXJ are equity ETFs. EWH charges 0.50% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: EWH costs 0.22% less per year.
- EWH costs 0.22% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than EWH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWH | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| Since | 1996 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.78% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.3% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.60% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -42.71% | -44.52% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.