Screener
AAXJ vs CNYA
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and CNYA are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- CNYA costs 0.12% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $242M |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -49.48% |
Similar to AAXJ and CNYA
Explore further