Screener
EWJ vs EZJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
Key differences
- EWJ costs 0.68% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWJ follows a index tracking strategy; EZJ uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWJ | EZJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.0B | $13M |
| Since | 1996 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.08% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.81% | 40.31% |
| Max drawdown | -33.14% | -58.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EWJ and EZJ
Explore further