Screener
EWJ vs EWV
iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
Key differences
- EWJ costs 0.46% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than EWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWJ follows a index tracking strategy; EWV uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWJ | EWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.0B | $7M |
| Since | 1996 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.08% | 4.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | -44.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | -28.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | -18.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.81% | 40.44% |
| Max drawdown | -33.14% | -90.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EWJ and EWV
Explore further