Screener
EZJ vs SCJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.67% less per year.
- SCJ is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $235M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and SCJ
Explore further