Screener
EWM vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and AAXJ are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: EWM covers emerging markets; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWM covers emerging markets; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWM costs 0.22% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than EWM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $4.0B |
| Since | 1996 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -44.52% |
Similar to EWM and AAXJ
Explore further