Screener
EWM vs EIDO
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and EIDO are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and EIDO 0.59%. The main difference: EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last three years, EWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | EIDO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $289M |
| Since | 1996 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 5.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | -36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | -18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | -9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | -1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 23.22% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -59.41% |
Similar to EWM and EIDO
Explore further