Screener
EWM vs EPHE
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and EPHE are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and EPHE 0.59%. The main difference: EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last three years, EWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | EPHE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $128M |
| Since | 1996 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 2.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +0.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | -2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | -0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 18.91% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -51.62% |
Similar to EWM and EPHE
Explore further