Screener
EWM vs EMXC
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and EMXC are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and EMXC 0.25%. The main difference: EMXC costs 0.25% less per year.
- EMXC costs 0.25% less per year.
- EMXC is much larger than EWM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $24.6B |
| Since | 1996 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 2.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +60.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 23.12% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -42.81% |
Similar to EWM and EMXC
Explore further