Screener
EWS vs IPAC
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both EWS and IPAC are equity ETFs. EWS charges 0.50% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: IPAC costs 0.41% less per year.
- IPAC costs 0.41% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than EWS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWS | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $783M | $2.6B |
| Since | 1996 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.14% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -40.84% | -31.00% |
Similar to EWS and IPAC
Explore further