Screener
EWS vs ASEA
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF vs Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
Key differences
Both EWS and ASEA are equity ETFs. EWS charges 0.50% a year and ASEA 0.65%. The main difference: EWS costs 0.15% less per year.
- EWS costs 0.15% less per year.
- EWS is much larger than ASEA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWS | ASEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $783M | $97M |
| Since | 1996 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.14% | 14.17% |
| Max drawdown | -40.84% | -44.16% |
Similar to EWS and ASEA
Explore further