Screener
SCJ vs EZJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.67% less per year.
- SCJ is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCJ follows a index tracking strategy; EZJ uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | EZJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $235M | $13M |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 40.31% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -58.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCJ and EZJ
Explore further