Screener
EWW vs CNYA
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both EWW and CNYA are equity ETFs. EWW charges 0.50% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: EWW covers Latin America; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- EWW covers Latin America; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- EWW costs 0.10% less per year.
- EWW is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWW | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $242M |
| Since | 1996 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | latin america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.39% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -53.62% | -49.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.