Screener
EWW vs IPAC
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both EWW and IPAC are equity ETFs. EWW charges 0.50% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: EWW covers Latin America; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWW covers Latin America; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IPAC costs 0.41% less per year.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWW | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $2.6B |
| Since | 1996 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | latin america | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.43 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.39% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -53.62% | -31.00% |
Similar to EWW and IPAC
Explore further