Screener
EZJ vs DBJP
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
Key differences
- DBJP costs 0.72% less per year.
- DBJP is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; DBJP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $613M |
| Since | 2009 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 2.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | +53.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +21.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 19.09% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -31.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and DBJP
Explore further