Screener
EZJ vs EUM
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EUM costs 0.22% less per year.
- EZJ covers asia pacific markets; EUM covers emerging markets.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; EUM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | EUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $9M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 4.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | -32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | -16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | -1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -67.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and EUM
Explore further