Screener
SCJ vs EWV
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.45% less per year.
- SCJ is significantly larger than EWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCJ follows a index tracking strategy; EWV uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | EWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $235M | $7M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 4.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | -44.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | -28.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | -18.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 40.44% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -90.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCJ and EWV
Explore further