Skip to content
Screener

EZMO vs LSAT

Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF vs LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF

EZMO

Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF

Annual cost

0.83%

Fund size

$16M

LSAT

LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$61M

Key differences

Both EZMO and LSAT are equity ETFs. EZMO charges 0.83% a year and LSAT 0.99%. The main difference: EZMO follows a index tracking strategy; LSAT uses active selection.

  • EZMO follows a index tracking strategy; LSAT uses active selection.
  • EZMO costs 0.16% less per year.
  • LSAT is much larger than EZMO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • LSAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EZMOLSAT
Annual cost (TER)0.83%0.99%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$61M
Since20252020
Dividend yield1.73%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+11.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+11.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.58
Volatility 1Y12.84%
Max drawdown-12.82%-20.48%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EZMO and LSAT