Screener
EZU vs HEFA
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF vs iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- HEFA costs 0.15% less per year.
- EZU covers global markets; HEFA covers global ex us.
- EZU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZU | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $7.0B |
| Since | 2000 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 3.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 12.74% |
| Max drawdown | -41.37% | -32.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZU and HEFA
Explore further