Screener
FMF vs LALT
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund vs First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
Key differences
- FMF costs 0.20% less per year.
- FMF is significantly larger than LALT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMF follows a managed futures strategy; LALT uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, LALT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMF | LALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $266M | $61M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.00% | 3.67% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | managed futures | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.9% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | 6.79% |
| Max drawdown | -16.89% | -6.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMF and LALT
Explore further