Screener
FAAR vs IMF
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.33% less per year.
- FAAR follows a long short strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAAR | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $168M | $301M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 9.07% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.1% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.44% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -18.03% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAAR and IMF
Explore further