Screener
FAAR vs PIT
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Key differences
- PIT costs 0.43% less per year.
- FAAR is classified as alternative, while PIT is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PIT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAAR | PIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $168M | $240M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 9.07% | 6.17% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +58.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.48% | 21.44% |
| Max drawdown | -18.03% | -12.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAAR and PIT
Explore further