Screener
FAAR vs QTAC
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- FAAR costs 0.80% less per year.
- FAAR is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAAR follows a long short strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAAR | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $168M | $54M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 9.07% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.48% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.03% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAAR and QTAC
Explore further