Screener
QTAC vs FMF
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Key differences
- FMF costs 0.80% less per year.
- FMF is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; FMF uses managed futures.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | FMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $266M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.64% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -16.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and FMF
Explore further